CMS, headless or DXP? Start by asking the right question.
You want a new CMS. But is that really the challenge?
)
Many organisations find that their current CMS is starting to hold them back. Publishing content takes too long. Teams work in silos. New functionality requires complex custom development. And at the same time, the pressure to deliver consistent digital experiences across websites, apps, portals and other channels continues to grow.
The obvious response? Start looking for a new CMS.
But that's where many organisations go wrong. As soon as you start thinking about multiple markets, multiple channels, personalisation, AI and integrations, you're no longer dealing with a CMS alone. You're dealing with the architecture behind your entire digital experience ecosystem. And that decision will shape the success or failure of your digital platform for years to come.
Download now
CMS, Headless & DXP in 2026: what the vendor pitch won't tell you
Which platform delivers the best demo? That's the wrong question.
The questions that really matter are about rendering strategies, BFF architecture, CMS schema governance, and the trade-offs between personalisation and caching. These topics rarely feature in a vendor presentation, yet they often determine whether your programme is delivered on time and whether your platform remains scalable three years from now.
In this whitepaper, we share our technical perspective on modern DXP architecture. No product brochure. No feature comparison matrix. Just the architectural decisions that genuinely matter, based on years of experience delivering complex international implementations for organisations such as Eneco, Husqvarna, AkzoNobel and DAF/PACCAR.
What you'll learn
The difference between a traditional CMS, a headless CMS and a Digital Experience Platform, and when each approach makes sense
Why composable architectures are the right direction for many organisations, but also introduce operational costs that need to be accounted for upfront
The role of the BFF (Backend for Frontend) layer, and why it is one of the most critical architectural decisions in a modern DXP programme
Why rendering strategy is a product decision rather than a development decision, with direct implications for performance, personalisation and SEO
Which technical decisions separate scalable, future-ready platforms from programmes that accumulate technical debt from day one
Who is this whitepaper for?
This whitepaper is designed for digital decision-makers involved in the selection, development or evolution of digital platforms. Think Digital Directors, IT Managers, Enterprise Architects, Product Owners and Platform Managers evaluating CMS replacement, headless architecture, composable platforms or a broader DXP strategy.
The whitepaper deliberately takes a technical perspective. Because the decisions that truly shape long-term success are rarely made during a vendor demo. They're made at the architecture level.