Why educational institutions lose prospective students in the student journey
Educational institutions are under pressure. Student numbers are declining, budgets are shrinking and competition for the right students is intensifying. At the same time, the expectations of prospective students are shifting faster than ever. That makes it more important than ever to turn orientation into enrolment — with less budget to work with.
In that context, relevance isn't a luxury. It's a condition for growth. Yet what we see time and again is that many institutions don't have a marketing problem. They have a coordination problem. Campaigns, content, websites and student support often operate in parallel, while prospective students expect one coherent experience.
Students don't drop out because of a single poor interaction. They drop out because of an accumulation of experiences that fail to build trust. Understanding where that happens starts with taking an honest look at how the orientation process actually works today.
)
)
Your campaigns are working. So why aren't students enrolling?
A strong campaign is no longer enough. A campaign can look excellent on the surface. The targeting is right, the message lands and the click-through rate is high. Yet enrolments fall short. The reason is usually the same: the experience after the click doesn't live up to the expectation the campaign created.
When a prospective student lands on a generic course page with no clear relevance or obvious next step, doubt sets in. The information is often thorough and complete, but it doesn't help anyone make a decision. The problem isn't the campaign itself. It's the disconnect between campaign, content and what comes next in the student journey.
)
Content that doesn't match where the student actually is. Most course pages are written from the institution's perspective: plenty of practical information, detailed descriptions of modules and competencies. But someone who is just starting to explore their options isn't looking for more information. They're looking for recognition. The feeling that a course suits them, that they'd belong there.
That need shifts as the process moves forward. What someone needs at the start of their orientation is fundamentally different from what they need just before they enrol. Someone who first discovers a course through TikTok has very different questions from someone who has already attended two open days and is nearly ready to sign up. Yet in many cases, both are served with exactly the same page and the same message.
Plenty of content, but no coherent student experience. Most educational institutions don't have a content shortage. Quite the opposite: there's a great deal of it, but no one is steering the whole. Campaigns are developed by the marketing team, the website is managed by a different department and open days are organised by the faculty itself.
The result shows up in the student's experience. They see a social ad from a university of applied sciences that leads with personal support, then land on a generic course page where that promise barely features, and then receive a standard open day invitation. Each element works on its own. Together, they don't add up to a consistent experience.
The result is a fragmented experience at a moment when prospective students are looking for consistency and familiarity. They encounter one institution. Not a collection of disconnected departments.
)
Why traditional student journeys no longer work.
Research by UPCEA and Search Influence shows that prospective students now navigate their options through a mix of channels: search engines, YouTube, social media and, increasingly, AI tools. 84% use search engines to research courses, 61% turn to YouTube and 50% now use AI tools as part of their orientation process. Rather than visiting dozens of websites, they ask their questions directly to AI and expect a clear answer straight away. That changes how courses are found and how they're assessed.
On top of that, prospective students unconsciously compare the experience of an educational institution with the digital experiences they encounter every day. Platforms like Spotify, TikTok and Netflix feel fast, personal and intuitive. That's the standard students bring with them. That doesn't mean every educational website needs to be fully personalised. But the experience does need to feel logical and relevant for the stage someone is at. In our blog Why traditional student journeys no longer work for Generation Alpha, we explore how this generation navigates its choices and what that means for educational institutions.
For many young people, choosing a course feels like a high-stakes decision. Doubt surfaces quickly, and trust has to be built across multiple touchpoints. When campaigns, website and other contact moments pull in different directions, that trust disappears as quickly as it forms.
How educational institutions can guide more students to enrolment
Institutions that get this right ask themselves a different question. Not: "What do we want to say?" But: "What does a prospective student need right now to take the next step?"
)
Aligning content with every stage of the student journey
That requires a different way of working. Frameworks like SEE / THINK / DO / CARE help structure this. In the SEE phase, it's about inspiration and recognition. In THINK, the need shifts to comparing and exploring. Only in the DO phase do open days, entry requirements and enrolment come into play. And the CARE phase matters too; a significant proportion of enrolled students drop out before their first day of class.
When content is aligned with each of these stages, the next step feels more natural and communication is experienced as more consistent.
)
Why growth in a shrinking market starts with internal coordination
But phase-aligned content alone isn't enough. Relevant student journeys emerge when teams work together, systems are connected and there is clear direction over content strategy and ownership across teams.
Institutions that invest in this see their campaigns perform better. Not because of larger media budgets, but because the overall experience better reflects how prospective students actually make their decisions.
)
Students don't just choose a course, they choose how they want to study
For many young people, choosing where to study goes beyond the subject matter. Prospective students aren't only deciding what they want to learn, but where and how. They assess not just the curriculum, but the culture, the support on offer and the way an institution helps students succeed throughout their studies.
That's precisely where many institutions leave opportunities on the table. They communicate extensively about modules, credits and career prospects, but far less about how they actually help students thrive.
Yet that's often where the real difference lies. An institution that makes this clear builds the trust needed for a prospective student to ultimately choose that course, and that institution.
Where is your institution losing prospective students?
Most of the drop-off in the student journey isn't visible in campaign data. It happens afterwards: on the website, after the open day, in the step a prospective student simply doesn't take.
Want to know where your journey stalls? Or how campaigns, content and contact moments can work better together? We're happy to take a look with you. No stack of recommendations, just a clear picture of where the biggest gains are.
Digital TransformationDigital StrategyCustomer ExperienceData